The occupied Syrian Golan Heights are the subject of a condemnation by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia following the Colombian government’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the territory.
According to SPA, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that this recognition contradicts international law and relevant international resolutions.
The Kingdom confirmed that the move directly violates United Nations resolutions, specifically Security Council Resolution 497 from 1981. That resolution declared the imposition of Israeli laws, jurisdiction, and administration over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights as null and void, lacking legal force.
Saudi Arabia emphasized that such positions do not contribute to peace but represent a departure from the established international position. The Kingdom asserted that the Golan Heights are occupied Arab territory of Syria and that any decisions to change their legal status do not create rights or legitimize such measures. The government of the Republic of Colombia was called upon to review its position and adhere to international law and resolutions of international legitimacy to support security, stability, and a just and lasting peace in the region.
Why did Saudi Arabia condemn the Colombian government’s recent position? Saudi Arabia condemned the Colombian government because it recognized Israeli sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights. The Kingdom stated that this action contradicts international law and relevant international resolutions, asserting that the Golan Heights remain occupied Arab territory belonging to Syria.
Which specific international resolution does Saudi Arabia cite regarding the Golan Heights? The Kingdom cited United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 from 1981. This specific resolution recognized that the imposition of Israeli administration, jurisdiction, and laws over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is null and void and possesses no legal force.
What is the Kingdom’s view on the legal status of the Golan Heights? The Kingdom maintains a firm position that the Golan Heights are occupied Arab territory of Syria. It asserts that any measures or decisions intended to change the legal status of the territory do not create any legal rights and do not legitimize such actions.