OIC Condemns Israeli Law Rejecting Palestinian State

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has strongly condemned the Israeli Knesset’s approval of a bill rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state, calling it a continuation of colonial occupation policies and a blatant defiance of international law and United Nations resolutions. The OIC, which represents 57 member states and is headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, reaffirmed its unwavering support for the two-state solution and urged the international community to uphold its responsibilities in ending the Israeli occupation and achieving a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace in the region.

Context and Background

The OIC’s condemnation, issued on July 18, 2024, comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East and follows a series of provocative actions by Israeli authorities. The Knesset’s approval of the bill rejecting Palestinian statehood directly undermines decades of international diplomacy aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a two-state solution. In its statement, the OIC emphasized that such actions violate international law principles and relevant United Nations resolutions, further isolating Israel on the global stage.

The organization also condemned the incursion of an extremist Israeli minister into the Al-Aqsa Mosque courtyards under the protection of Israeli occupation forces. It reiterated its rejection of all Israeli policies aimed at altering the geographic and demographic reality in occupied Jerusalem and attempts to undermine the historical and legal status quo of Al-Aqsa Mosque. The OIC affirmed the shared responsibility to defend the mosque and work towards its return to Palestinian sovereignty as an integral part of the Palestinian territories occupied in 1967 and the capital of the State of Palestine.

Key Details

The OIC called on the international community to empower the Palestinian people to exercise their legitimate national rights, including the right to return, self-determination, and the establishment of an independent state on the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. It also affirmed support for all efforts by the State of Palestine to mobilize international responsibility, including activating international justice mechanisms to hold Israel accountable for war crimes and genocide and to rectify the historical injustice inflicted on the Palestinian people.

Furthermore, the OIC strongly condemned Israeli measures aimed at undermining the status and role of UNRWA through direct attacks on its facilities, targeting its employees, and obstructing its activities in the occupied Palestinian territory. It considered this an extension of Israeli violations of the UN Charter, its resolutions, and the agreement on privileges and immunities.

The organization reaffirmed its decisions issued by successive summits and ministerial councils, calling for continued work with international actors to halt Israeli military aggression against the Palestinian people throughout the occupied Palestinian territory, especially in the Gaza Strip. It called on all countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine to do so and support its right to full membership in the United Nations. This call to action underscores the OIC’s commitment to mobilizing global support for Palestinian statehood and holding Israel accountable for its actions.

Implications and Impact

The OIC’s strong condemnation and call to action carry significant implications for international diplomacy and regional stability. By reaffirming its support for the two-state solution and urging recognition of Palestine, the OIC is pressuring the international community to take a definitive stance on the conflict. This could lead to increased diplomatic isolation of Israel and bolster momentum for Palestinian statehood efforts at the United Nations.

Moreover, the OIC’s condemnation of Israeli actions in Jerusalem and against UNRWA highlights the organization’s role as a defender of Palestinian rights and Islamic holy sites. It also reinforces the OIC’s position as a key player in mediating and advocating for peace in the Middle East, in line with the principles of the United Nations and international law.

The statement from the OIC, based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, reflects the Kingdom’s leadership in promoting peace and stability in the region. Saudi Arabia has consistently supported the Palestinian cause and has been a vocal advocate for a two-state solution. The OIC’s stance is likely to resonate with many countries and could influence future diplomatic engagements and peace initiatives.

Vision 2030 Alignment

Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, a comprehensive plan to diversify the economy and enhance the Kingdom’s global role, includes a strong commitment to supporting just causes and fostering international peace and security. The OIC’s condemnation of the Knesset’s bill and its call for Palestinian statehood align with Saudi Arabia’s broader efforts to promote stability and justice in the region. Under the leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia continues to play a pivotal role in advocating for Palestinian rights and facilitating dialogue towards a lasting peace. The Kingdom’s steadfast support for the OIC’s initiatives underscores its dedication to upholding international law and the principles of justice, which are integral to achieving the goals of Vision 2030 and ensuring a prosperous and peaceful future for the region and beyond.

20 Questions

Q1. What did the OIC condemn?

A1. The OIC condemned the Israeli Knesset’s approval of a bill rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state, calling it a continuation of colonial occupation policies and a violation of international law.

Q2. When did the OIC issue this condemnation?

A2. The OIC issued its condemnation on July 18, 2024, in a statement released from its headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Q3. What solution does the OIC support?

A3. The OIC firmly supports the two-state solution, calling for an independent Palestinian state on the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.

Q4. What did the OIC say about the Israeli minister’s incursion?

A4. The OIC condemned the incursion of an extremist Israeli minister into the Al-Aqsa Mosque courtyards under Israeli occupation forces’ protection, reiterating its rejection of policies altering Jerusalem’s status.

Q5. What is the OIC’s stance on UNRWA?

A5. The OIC strongly condemned Israeli measures undermining UNRWA’s status and role, including attacks on its facilities and employees, considering this a violation of the UN Charter.

Q6. What did the OIC urge the international community to do?

A6. The OIC urged the international community to end the Israeli occupation, achieve a just and lasting peace, and empower the Palestinian people to exercise their legitimate national rights.

Q7. What rights did the OIC emphasize for Palestinians?

A7. The OIC emphasized the right to return, self-determination, and the establishment of an independent state on pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.

Q8. How does the OIC view Israeli actions in Jerusalem?

A8. The OIC views Israeli actions in Jerusalem as attempts to change the geographic and demographic reality and undermine the historical and legal status quo of Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Q9. What did the OIC say about international justice?

A9. The OIC affirmed support for activating international justice mechanisms to hold Israel accountable for war crimes and genocide against the Palestinian people.

Q10. What did the OIC call on countries to do regarding Palestine?

A10. The OIC called on all countries that have not recognized the State of Palestine to do so and to support its right to full membership in the United Nations.

Q11. What is the OIC’s position on Israeli military aggression?

A11. The OIC reaffirmed its decisions calling for continued work with international actors to halt Israeli military aggression against the Palestinian people, especially in the Gaza Strip.

Q12. How many member states does the OIC represent?

A12. The OIC represents 57 member states and is headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, making it the second-largest intergovernmental organization after the United Nations.

Q13. What is the significance of the OIC’s statement?

A13. The statement reinforces the OIC’s role as a defender of Palestinian rights and Islamic holy sites, pressuring the international community to take a definitive stance on the conflict.

Q14. How does Saudi Arabia support the Palestinian cause?

A14. Saudi Arabia consistently supports the Palestinian cause, advocates for a two-state solution, and plays a pivotal role in promoting peace and stability in the region through the OIC and other diplomatic efforts.

Q15. What is Vision 2030’s connection to this issue?

A15. Vision 2030 includes a commitment to supporting just causes and fostering international peace, aligning with the OIC’s condemnation and Saudi Arabia’s advocacy for Palestinian rights.

Q16. What did the OIC say about UN resolutions?

A16. The OIC stated that the Knesset’s bill blatantly defies international law principles and relevant United Nations resolutions, calling for accountability and rectification of historical injustices.

Q17. What actions did the OIC condemn regarding Al-Aqsa Mosque?

A17. The OIC condemned Israeli policies aimed at changing the status quo in Al-Aqsa Mosque and attempts to undermine its historical and legal status, affirming shared responsibility to defend it.

Q18. What is the OIC’s call regarding Palestinian sovereignty?

A18. The OIC called for the return of Al-Aqsa Mosque to Palestinian sovereignty as part of the territories occupied in 1967 and the capital of the State of Palestine.

Q19. How does the OIC view Israel’s actions against UNRWA?

A19. The OIC considers Israel’s actions against UNRWA an extension of severe violations of the UN Charter, its resolutions, and the agreement on privileges and immunities.

Q20. What did the OIC reaffirm from its summits?

A20. The OIC reaffirmed decisions from successive summits and ministerial councils, calling for continued work with international actors to halt Israeli aggression and support Palestinian statehood.

---