Al-Burhan: Middle East Peace Linked to End of Occupation

Sudanese Transitional Sovereign Council President Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan declared at the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit in Riyadh on November 11, 2024, that lasting peace in the Middle East depends on the complete end of the Israeli occupation of all Arab territories, including the Golan Heights, in line with United Nations Security Council resolutions and the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. His remarks, carried by the Saudi Press Agency, placed the Palestinian question and the broader question of occupied Arab land at the center of the region’s stability equation, during a summit hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at a moment of exceptional regional tension.

Al-Burhan’s address was delivered before an assembly of Arab and Islamic leaders convened in the Saudi capital, a setting that underscored Riyadh’s continuing role as a convening power for the Muslim world and a diplomatic hub for de-escalation. The Sudanese leader used the platform not only to restate the long-standing Arab consensus on Palestine but also to draw attention to the crisis in his own country, where conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces has caused widespread displacement and suffering. His dual message — regional peace and national survival — reflected how interconnected the security challenges of the Middle East and the wider Islamic world have become.

Context and Background

Why does a single speech in Riyadh carry weight far beyond the summit hall? Because the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit brought together heads of state and government from across the Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, giving its proceedings a collective legitimacy that individual national statements rarely achieve. Saudi Arabia, as host, has consistently used such gatherings to push for unified positions on regional crises while emphasizing diplomacy, humanitarian relief, and respect for international law. The summit’s timing, in November 2024, came amid heightened regional instability, making the call for restraint and a negotiated path all the more urgent.

Al-Burhan’s reference points were deliberate and historically grounded. United Nations Security Council resolutions have for decades formed the internationally accepted framework for resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict, including resolutions 242 and 338, which address the inadmissibility of acquiring territory by force and the need for a just and lasting peace. The 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, endorsed by the Arab League and later supported by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, offered Israel normal relations with the Arab world in exchange for a full withdrawal from occupied territories and a negotiated settlement. By invoking both, Al-Burhan anchored his position in established multilateral instruments rather than in new demands.

The Golan Heights reference added a Syrian dimension to a debate often reduced to Gaza and the West Bank. International law, as reflected in Security Council Resolution 497 of 1981, treats the Golan as occupied Syrian territory, a position that remains the baseline for most states. Raising it at an Arab and Islamic summit signals that the broader question of occupied Arab land has not been set aside, even as attention focuses on the humanitarian emergency in Gaza and the search for a durable ceasefire.

Key Details

What exactly did Al-Burhan ask the international community to do? His appeal was specific: expedite implementation of the two-state solution, secure a ceasefire, prevent the escalation of regional conflict, halt the displacement of Gazans, and ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid to displaced persons. Each element reflects a distinct track of diplomacy that Saudi Arabia and its partners have pursued — a political track centered on statehood, a security track centered on stopping the fighting, and a humanitarian track centered on relief access. Together they form a comprehensive rather than piecemeal approach to the crisis.

The two-state solution remains the internationally endorsed framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, envisaging an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel on the basis of the 1967 lines with agreed land swaps. Al-Burhan’s emphasis on speeding up its implementation echoed positions adopted repeatedly by Arab and Islamic summits and by the United Nations. The call to prevent regional escalation likewise reflected a shared concern that the conflict could draw in additional actors and destabilize neighboring countries, a risk that Riyadh has consistently warned against.

On Sudan, Al-Burhan condemned the actions of the Rapid Support Forces, describing them as aimed at destroying the Sudanese state and causing widespread displacement and starvation in clear violation of international humanitarian law. He expressed confidence that the Sudanese people, with the support of their allies, would overcome the crisis. His presence in Riyadh itself was significant: it demonstrated that Sudan’s internationally recognized leadership continues to engage with Arab and Islamic partners even as fighting continues at home, and it kept Sudan’s humanitarian catastrophe on the summit agenda alongside Palestine.

International and Regional Impact

How does a summit declaration translate into pressure on the ground? The immediate effect is diplomatic: it consolidates a collective Arab and Islamic position that individual mediators can carry into talks with global powers, including the United States, the European Union, and the United Nations. When dozens of states speak with one voice on the need for a ceasefire and humanitarian access, the cost of ignoring that consensus rises. Saudi Arabia has positioned itself as a bridge between the Islamic world and Western capitals, and summits of this kind give that role concrete form.

For Sudan, the summit provided a rare moment of high-level visibility. The conflict there has produced one of the world’s largest displacement crises, and Al-Burhan’s appeal for support from allies was a reminder that Arab and Islamic solidarity can extend beyond Palestine to other member states in distress. Riyadh has hosted Sudanese peace initiatives and humanitarian conferences, reflecting a consistent Saudi preference for dialogue and negotiated settlements over prolonged conflict. The linkage Al-Burhan drew between Palestine and Sudan also highlighted how regional instability tends to compound, with each crisis straining the same diplomatic and humanitarian systems.

Economic and Strategic Significance

Why should markets and investors beyond the region care about the language of occupation and statehood? Because peace and stability are prerequisites for the cross-border investment, trade corridors, and infrastructure projects that underpin regional economic plans. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 rests on diversifying the economy, attracting foreign investment, expanding tourism, and building world-class logistics and technology sectors. Those ambitions are easier to realize in a stable neighborhood, and harder in one where conflict risks spilling across borders or disrupting shipping lanes and energy markets.

The Kingdom’s diplomatic engagement on Palestine, including hosting summits and supporting humanitarian relief, therefore sits alongside its economic modernization rather than apart from it. A credible political horizon for the Palestinian question is widely seen as a condition for durable regional normalization, which in turn would unlock deeper commercial integration between the Gulf, the Levant, and beyond. Saudi officials have consistently linked regional de-escalation to the economic opportunities that Vision 2030 is designed to capture, from NEOM and the Red Sea coast to the expansion of non-oil exports and the growth of the private sector.

Vision 2030 Alignment

How does a speech about occupation and peace connect to Saudi Arabia’s long-term vision? Vision 2030 is not only an economic blueprint; it is a statement of intent about the Kingdom’s role in the world. By convening the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit and providing a platform for leaders such as Al-Burhan, Saudi Arabia reinforces its position as a stabilizing force, a mediator, and a champion of multilateral solutions. That reputation is central to the Kingdom’s soft power and to its ability to attract partners, events, and investment to its soil.

The summit’s outcomes — a renewed call for a two-state solution, a ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access, and an end to displacement — align with the principles of justice, development, and dignity that underpin Vision 2030’s social and economic goals. As Saudi Arabia continues to modernize, it does so while insisting that regional peace remain anchored in international law and the Arab Peace Initiative. For international readers, the message from Riyadh is clear: the Kingdom will keep using its convening power to push for de-escalation, relief for civilians, and a political path that allows the entire region to focus on prosperity rather than conflict.

20 Questions

Q1. Who made the statement linking Middle East peace to the end of Israeli occupation?

A1. Sudanese Transitional Sovereign Council President Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan made the statement while addressing the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit in Riyadh on November 11, 2024.

Q2. Where was the statement delivered?

A2. It was delivered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, at the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit, which brought together leaders from Arab League and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation member states.

Q3. What did Al-Burhan say is necessary for lasting Middle East peace?

A3. He said lasting peace requires the complete end of the Israeli occupation of all Arab territories, including the Golan Heights, in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions.

Q4. Which peace initiative did Al-Burhan reference?

A4. He referenced the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, which offered Israel normal relations with Arab states in exchange for withdrawal from occupied territories and a negotiated settlement.

Q5. What actions did Al-Burhan urge the international community to take?

A5. He called for expediting the two-state solution, securing a ceasefire, preventing regional escalation, halting the displacement of Gazans, and ensuring humanitarian aid reaches displaced persons.

Q6. What is the two-state solution?

A6. It is the internationally endorsed framework envisaging an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel based on the 1967 lines with agreed land swaps, supported by the UN and Arab states.

Q7. Why is the Golan Heights mentioned in his remarks?

A7. UN Security Council Resolution 497 of 1981 treats the Golan as occupied Syrian territory, and Al-Burhan included it among Arab territories that should be returned under international law.

Q8. What did Al-Burhan say about Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces?

A8. He condemned their actions as aimed at destroying the Sudanese state and causing widespread displacement and starvation in clear violation of international humanitarian law.

Q9. How did Al-Burhan describe the Sudanese people’s prospects?

A9. He expressed confidence that the Sudanese people, with the support of their allies, will overcome the current crisis and restore stability to their country.

Q10. Which agency reported the statement?

A10. The Saudi Press Agency reported the statement, reflecting the official Saudi channel through which the summit proceedings and Al-Burhan’s remarks were communicated.

Q11. What is the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit?

A11. It is a joint gathering of Arab League and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation states, convened in Riyadh to coordinate positions on pressing regional issues including Palestine and humanitarian crises.

Q12. What role did Saudi Arabia play in the summit?

A12. Saudi Arabia hosted the summit in Riyadh, providing the platform and diplomatic leadership that allowed Arab and Islamic leaders to coordinate their positions on regional peace and stability.

Q13. Why does the summit matter for regional stability?

A13. It consolidates a collective Arab and Islamic position that mediators can carry into talks with global powers, raising the diplomatic cost of ignoring calls for ceasefire and humanitarian access.

Q14. What humanitarian concerns were raised?

A14. Al-Burhan highlighted the need to halt the displacement of Gazans and ensure aid delivery to displaced persons, addressing one of the most urgent humanitarian emergencies in the region.

Q15. How does the statement relate to UN Security Council resolutions?

A15. It grounds the peace framework in resolutions such as 242, 338, and 497, which address the inadmissibility of acquiring territory by force and the need for a just settlement.

Q16. What is the economic significance of regional peace?

A16. Peace enables cross-border investment, trade corridors, and infrastructure projects, supporting Saudi Vision 2030 goals of economic diversification, tourism growth, and attracting foreign investment.

Q17. How does the summit align with Saudi Vision 2030?

A17. Vision 2030 emphasizes the Kingdom’s global role and soft power; hosting the summit reinforces Saudi Arabia’s position as a stabilizing mediator and champion of multilateral solutions.

Q18. What does Saudi Arabia seek to achieve through such diplomacy?

A18. The Kingdom seeks de-escalation, humanitarian relief, and a credible political path that allows the region to focus on prosperity, in line with its long-term vision and regional leadership.

Q19. What did Al-Burhan say about displacement in Gaza?

A19. He called for halting the displacement of Gazans and ensuring humanitarian aid reaches displaced persons, framing these as urgent obligations under international humanitarian law.

Q20. What is the broader message for international readers?

A20. The message is that Riyadh remains a convening power for the Muslim world, pushing for peace anchored in international law and the Arab Peace Initiative while pursuing its own modernization.

Reader Feedback

We value your thoughts. Please share your feedback on this article.

Name *

Message *

Your feedback helps us improve our coverage.